<\!DOCTYPE html> Free VA Claims Analysis Demo | VDataOS <\!-- Open Graph --> <\!-- Twitter Card --> <\!-- JSON-LD -->

⚡ Live demo — anonymized sample case with real analysis output. Create a free account to analyze your actual claim.

<\!-- Hero -->
⚡ Interactive Demo — No Account Required

See exactly what your
C&P exam is missing

Sample analysis for an OIF/OEF veteran with four service-connected conditions. Two examiner errors flagged, one secondary connection identified, $47,200 in estimated back-pay at risk.

Upload Your Documents — Free
No credit card · No setup · Results in under 2 minutes
<\!-- Case Summary Card -->
Sample Case File
John D. — Army Veteran, OIF/OEF
Service Period 2003 – 2011 (8 years)
Service Branch U.S. Army
Theater OIF / OEF
Claim Date 3 years prior (effective date)
Documents Analyzed 4 files · 52 pages
📄 Rating Decision (2023) 🔬 C&P Exam — Dr. Harmon 📝 Nexus Letter — Dr. Singh 📋 STR Discharge Summary
Combined Rating
80%
VA Combined Formula
<\!-- Metrics -->
2
Examiner Errors Flagged
1
Secondary Connection Identified
4
Conditions • 4 VASRD Codes
$47.2K
Est. Back-Pay at Risk
<\!-- Tabs -->
<\!-- TAB 1: CONDITIONS -->
📋
Conditions Analysis — VASRD Codes & Ratings
Combined 80% using VA whole-person formula • Individual ratings below
80% COMBINED
Condition VASRD DC Individual Rating Status Evidence on File Analysis Notes
PTSD
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
 DC 9411 70% ● Service-Connected Combat records Stressor statement Psych eval PCL-5 score 58 70% appropriate per criteria. Examiner rationale insufficient — see Error #1. Potential increase to 100% if occupational impairment documented.
Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
DDD, L4-L5
 DC 5242 40% ● Service-Connected In-service sick call MRI (2022) C&P DBQ 40% based on flexion ≤30°. DeLuca factors not fully assessed — functional loss post-repetition may support increase.
Bilateral Tinnitus
Ringing in both ears, noise-induced
 DC 6260 10% ● Service-Connected Audiology report Noise exposure records 10% is the maximum schedule rating for tinnitus under DC 6260. Well-documented; no action needed.
Hypertension
Secondary to PTSD — 38 CFR §3.310
 DC 7101 30% ● Secondary SC Cardiology records BP readings ≥130/90 Diastolic predominantly 100-109 = 30%. Secondary connection to PTSD; examiner failed to address nexus — see Error #2.
<\!-- TAB 2: EXAMINER ERRORS -->
⚖ Not Legal Advice. These findings identify potential examiner errors for informational purposes. Consult an accredited VA claims agent or VSO attorney before taking action.
🔬
C&P Exam Error Detection
Dr. M. Harmon, DBQ dated 08/12/2022 — Initial Claim
2 ERRORS FLAGGED
<\!-- Error 1: Critical - PTSD severity rationale -->
Critical
Insufficient Rationale for PTSD Severity Rating
38 CFR § 4.130 · Nieves-Rodriguez v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 295
CUE Viable ▼
Finding
The examiner assigned a 70% rating for PTSD but provided no discussion of the specific criteria met, no occupational history review, and no explanation for why 100% total occupational and social impairment was not found. The PCL-5 score of 58 and the veteran's documented inability to maintain employment were not addressed in the rationale. Under Nieves-Rodriguez v. Peake, a medical opinion is entitled to probative weight only when it includes a discussion of the pertinent evidence and an adequate rationale connecting that evidence to the conclusion.
Verbatim from Exam Report
"PTSD symptoms are consistent with severe presentation. A rating of 70% is appropriate based on the veteran's reported symptoms." — C&P DBQ, Mental Health Section, pg. 6
What Is Missing
The examiner did not: (1) address the veteran's three-year employment gap documented in the record; (2) reconcile the PCL-5 score of 58 (severe range) against the 70% vs. 100% threshold criteria; (3) obtain collateral history from family members or treating therapist; (4) document specific 38 CFR §4.130 diagnostic criteria met for 70% vs 100%. This leaves the rating vulnerable to a higher finding if a well-documented C&P opinion is submitted.
💡 Request a new examination with a VA mental health specialist or submit a private independent medical examination (IME) specifically addressing occupational impairment, social functioning, and §4.130 criteria. The treating therapist’s records and a buddy statement from the employer documenting job loss are high-value evidence. This is also viable as a CUE if the prior rating decision explicitly relied on this inadequate examination.
<\!-- Error 2: Critical - hypertension nexus -->
Critical
Missing Nexus Analysis for Hypertension Secondary to PTSD
38 CFR § 3.310(a) · Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498
▼
Finding
The examiner evaluated hypertension as a primary direct-service condition and found it “less likely than not” service-connected. The examiner never addressed the possibility of secondary service connection under 38 CFR §3.310(a) — that hypertension is caused or aggravated by the veteran’s already service-connected PTSD. The well-established PTSD–cardiovascular stress pathway was not discussed. The denial therefore rests on an incomplete analysis.
Verbatim from Exam Report
"Hypertension: It is less likely as not that the veteran’s hypertension is related to military service. The condition is consistent with age-related onset and family history." — C&P DBQ, Internal Medicine Section, pg. 11
What Was Omitted
The examiner did not consider: (1) the veteran’s PTSD was service-connected at 70% as of 2021 — before the hypertension diagnosis formalized; (2) peer-reviewed literature establishing a 35–40% higher hypertension prevalence in combat veterans with PTSD independent of family history; (3) the treating cardiologist’s note referencing “significant stress component”; (4) the temporal relationship between PTSD onset and BP elevation. Secondary service connection under §3.310(a) does not require proof the condition originated in service — only that it is “proximately due to or the result of” a service-connected disability.
💡 File a secondary service connection claim for hypertension under 38 CFR §3.310(a). Submit a private nexus letter from a cardiologist or internist specifically addressing the PTSD–cardiovascular pathway, citing the temporal relationship and the treating cardiologist’s own notes. The examiner’s opinion — which never considered secondary SC — will have limited probative weight against a well-reasoned private nexus.
<\!-- TAB 3: SECONDARY CONNECTIONS -->
🔗
Secondary Connection Inference
AI-identified pathway the rating decision did not consider
1 PATHWAY IDENTIFIED
<\!-- Pathway 1: PTSD > Hypertension -->
Hypertension (DC 7101) ⚠ Examiner Did Not Address Secondary SC
PTSD (DC 9411, Service-Connected 70%) → Secondary Causation under 38 CFR §3.310(a) → Hypertension (DC 7101)
Strong Nexus
Medical Rationale
PTSD produces chronic activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and sympathetic nervous system, leading to elevated cortisol and catecholamine levels. These neuroendocrine changes are a direct physiological stressor on the cardiovascular system and a well-established mechanism for hypertension development. Multiple peer-reviewed longitudinal studies show veterans with PTSD have a 35–40% higher incidence of hypertension compared to matched controls, independent of other cardiovascular risk factors including family history.

John D.’s PTSD was formally service-connected at 70% in 2021. His first documented hypertension diagnosis appears in cardiology records from Q3 2021 — a temporal relationship consistent with secondary causation under §3.310(a).
38 CFR § 3.310(a) — Secondary Service Connection
Evidence in Your Records
✓ PTSD service-connected at 70% (2021)
✓ Hypertension onset documented post-PTSD rating
✓ Treating cardiologist note: “significant stress component”
✓ BP readings ≥130/90 across multiple visits
✓ No prior hypertension history pre-service

What is missing: A private nexus letter from a physician (cardiologist or internist) specifically stating hypertension is “at least as likely as not” caused or aggravated by service-connected PTSD, with citation to the PTSD–cardiovascular literature.
⚠ Missing: Targeted Secondary Nexus Letter
⚠ Missing: Secondary Claim Filed Under §3.310(a)
<\!-- TAB 4: EVIDENCE MATRIX -->
📊
Evidence Matrix — 8 Pieces Mapped to Conditions
Evidence strength and condition linkage across all service-connected claims
8 EVIDENCE ITEMS
01
Service Treatment Records (STR) — Discharge Summary
Documents in-service sick call visits for back pain (3 visits, 2007–2008) and audiology screening showing noise-induced hearing changes. Establishes in-service incurrence for lumbar and tinnitus claims.
DC 5242 Lumbar DC 6260 Tinnitus
Strong
02
PCL-5 (PTSD Checklist) — Score 58
Standardized PTSD severity measure. Score of 58 places veteran in severe range (threshold for probable PTSD is 31–33). Examiner cited this score but did not reconcile against 70% vs 100% criteria under 38 CFR §4.130.
DC 9411 PTSD
Strong
03
Lumbar MRI Report (2022) — L4-L5 Disc Herniation
Imaging confirms degenerative disc disease at L4-L5 with moderate central stenosis. Consistent with in-service injury mechanism. Supports current rating but DeLuca functional analysis not performed by examiner.
DC 5242 Lumbar
Strong
04
Audiology Report — Bilateral Tinnitus Diagnosis
Formal audiological evaluation confirming bilateral tinnitus with documented noise exposure history during combat deployments. Supports 10% maximum schedule rating; no gaps identified for this condition.
DC 6260 Tinnitus
Strong
05
Treating Cardiologist Note — “Stress Component”
Cardiologist treatment note documents “significant stress-related component” to hypertension presentation. Critical bridge evidence for secondary SC claim — partially supports nexus but falls short of the “at least as likely as not” standard without an explicit opinion letter.
DC 7101 Hypertension DC 9411 PTSD
Moderate
06
Treating Therapist Records (2019–2023)
36 months of psychiatric treatment records documenting symptom severity, functional limitations, and occupational disruption. Examiner did not review these records before assigning PTSD rating. High-value evidence for potential 100% increase.
DC 9411 PTSD
Strong
07
Blood Pressure Log — Multiple Readings ≥130/90
Serial BP readings across 18 months documenting sustained hypertension meeting §4.104 criteria for 30% rating (diastolic predominantly 100–109, or systolic predominantly 160 or more). Supports current rating assignment.
DC 7101 Hypertension
Strong
08
Employer Separation Documentation
Records documenting separation from employment citing inability to maintain consistent attendance and performance due to PTSD symptoms. This evidence was not submitted with the original claim and was not reviewed by the examiner — directly relevant to 100% PTSD criteria.
DC 9411 PTSD
Moderate
<\!-- Back-Pay Calculation -->
💰
Back-Pay Estimate — 3-Year Effective Date
Based on identified errors & effective date from original claim filing
Effective Date
3 Years Prior
Monthly Differential
~$1,311/mo
Estimated Back-Pay
$47,200
Estimate based on 2024 VA compensation rates for 80% combined rating vs. prior rating, over a 36-month back-pay period. Actual amounts depend on dependent status, effective date determination, and final rating decisions. This is an estimate only — not a guarantee.
<\!-- Bottom CTA -->

See Your Analysis — Upload Your Documents

Upload your C&P exams, rating decisions, and medical records. Our AI identifies examiner errors, maps secondary connections, validates VASRD codes, and calculates your back-pay exposure — in under 2 minutes.

🚀 Upload Your Documents — Free How It Works
No credit card required
AES-256 encrypted storage
Documents never shared
SOC 2 audit logging
Results in under 2 minutes